An evidence-based assessment of platform health and service maturity across the WTTJ ecosystem. Pragmatic approach with actionable improvements.
Open vulnerabilities from pentest findings. Dependencies need updates.
All AI features depend on OpenAI. Has retry/timeouts, but no multi-provider fallback.
Changes in one area unexpectedly break other areas. Hard to predict impact.
Services too interconnected. Changes require coordination with other teams.
Only repo that tests business rules (auth lockout, password history).
Has resilience (5/10), but no events (1/10), duplicates wttj_ai.
BEST app layer (features/queries/dtos), weak resilience (2/10).
Reference implementation - perfect API isolation, feature-based clean architecture.
Replacing wk-front. GraphQL-first, needs test coverage improvement.
LOW: 33 tests, 1 keyboard handler, lowest ARIA count (23).
Frontend Gaps: 5 of 7 repos have zero code splitting, 4 of 7 have TypeScript strict mode disabled, keyboard navigation critically underdeveloped.
Weeks 1-4: P0 Issues
Weeks 5-8: Quality & Architecture
Ongoing: Continuous Improvement
Unclear if migration is for consolidation or revenue
Pricing added Dec without tech input, constant reprioritization
1 QA, 1 SRE for all. 3-4 missing on ATS. Key departures.
"Need to focus on fewer priorities to deliver quality"
— Key theme from interviewsOngoing oversight of migration progress, blocker resolution, and alignment with platform goals.
Hands-on sessions covering clean architecture, testing best practices, and code quality patterns.
Evidence-based approach: All findings are reproducible. Highest code quality service (Sourcing) used as internal reference baseline. View full report →